We are a fantasy baseball league whose draft is scheduled for May 1. Ten men enter (or nine or eight), and one man leaves.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Monday, August 03, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Last Three Weeks: *Bob is Surging* Who Knew?
Standings from 7/9/2009 thru 7/29/2009 (including game stats through 7/29/2009)
Download to Excel
Name | Avg | HR | R | RBI | SB | ERA | K | S | W | W PCT | Total |
The Raiders | 9.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 65.5 |
T. S. Intellectual | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 61.0 |
The Stinking Badgers | 5.0 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 60.0 |
The Depositions | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 59.5 |
Little Chi Chi | 2.0 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 46.0 |
Giant Steps | 4.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 45.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 6.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 42.0 |
Marfa Dogs | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 37.0 |
The FunGhouls | 1.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 33.5 |
Batting Average
Name | Total | Points |
The Raiders | .3074 | 9 |
The Depositions | .3058 | 8 |
T. S. Intellectual | .2903 | 7 |
A Cancer on the League | .2795 | 6 |
The Stinking Badgers | .2564 | 5 |
Giant Steps | .2537 | 4 |
Marfa Dogs | .2507 | 3 |
Little Chi Chi | .2455 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | .2449 | 1 |
Home Runs (Batter)
Name | Total | Points |
The Depositions | 25 | 9 |
The FunGhouls | 22 | 8 |
T. S. Intellectual | 21 | 7 |
Giant Steps | 18 | 5.5 |
Little Chi Chi | 18 | 5.5 |
The Raiders | 16 | 3.5 |
The Stinking Badgers | 16 | 3.5 |
Marfa Dogs | 14 | 1.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 14 | 1.5 |
RBI
Name | Total | Points |
The Depositions | 93 | 9 |
T. S. Intellectual | 80 | 8 |
Little Chi Chi | 71 | 7 |
The FunGhouls | 70 | 6 |
The Raiders | 69 | 4.5 |
Giant Steps | 69 | 4.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 63 | 3 |
The Stinking Badgers | 58 | 2 |
Marfa Dogs | 52 | 1 |
Runs (Batter)
Name | Total | Points |
The Depositions | 87 | 9 |
Little Chi Chi | 78 | 8 |
T. S. Intellectual | 76 | 6.5 |
The Stinking Badgers | 76 | 6.5 |
The Raiders | 75 | 4.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 75 | 4.5 |
The FunGhouls | 69 | 3 |
Giant Steps | 66 | 2 |
Marfa Dogs | 51 | 1 |
Stolen Bases
Name | Total | Points |
T. S. Intellectual | 16 | 8.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 16 | 8.5 |
The Stinking Badgers | 15 | 7 |
The Depositions | 14 | 6 |
The Raiders | 12 | 5 |
The FunGhouls | 10 | 3.5 |
Little Chi Chi | 10 | 3.5 |
Marfa Dogs | 7 | 2 |
Giant Steps | 5 | 1 |
ERA
Name | Total | Points |
The Stinking Badgers | 2.1985 | 9 |
The Raiders | 3.2239 | 8 |
Giant Steps | 3.5357 | 7 |
The FunGhouls | 4.0000 | 6 |
Marfa Dogs | 4.8926 | 5 |
T. S. Intellectual | 5.1246 | 4 |
The Depositions | 5.2326 | 3 |
A Cancer on the League | 5.3006 | 2 |
Little Chi Chi | 5.4750 | 1 |
Pitcher Winning Percent
Name | Total | Points |
The Raiders | .7333 | 9 |
The Stinking Badgers | .6923 | 8 |
Marfa Dogs | .6364 | 7 |
Giant Steps | .6000 | 6 |
A Cancer on the League | .5455 | 5 |
The Depositions | .5385 | 4 |
The FunGhouls | .5000 | 3 |
T. S. Intellectual | .3333 | 2 |
Little Chi Chi | .2941 | 1 |
Saves
Name | Total | Points |
Little Chi Chi | 13 | 9 |
T. S. Intellectual | 11 | 8 |
Giant Steps | 9 | 7 |
The Raiders | 8 | 6 |
Marfa Dogs | 7 | 5 |
A Cancer on the League | 4 | 4 |
The Depositions | 3 | 3 |
The Stinking Badgers | 1 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | 0 | 1 |
Strikeouts
Name | Total | Points |
The Stinking Badgers | 120 | 9 |
T. S. Intellectual | 96 | 8 |
The Raiders | 95 | 7 |
Little Chi Chi | 91 | 6 |
Marfa Dogs | 86 | 5 |
Giant Steps | 80 | 4 |
A Cancer on the League | 78 | 3 |
The Depositions | 69 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | 44 | 1 |
Wins
Name | Total | Points |
The Raiders | 11 | 9 |
The Stinking Badgers | 9 | 8 |
Marfa Dogs | 7 | 6.5 |
The Depositions | 7 | 6.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 6 | 4.5 |
Giant Steps | 6 | 4.5 |
Little Chi Chi | 5 | 3 |
T. S. Intellectual | 4 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | 3 | 1 |
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Thursday, July 09, 2009
News and Notes from Around the League
Image via Wikipedia
As you can see below, while we were *all* sleeping, Berger fell upon us and used us for his pleasure. But if you look at his lineup, it's no surprise that Kevin is now not only in front, he's *way* in front and likely to stay there in spite of the marvelousness of Michael Tola, our poet, prophet, peasant and king.He took a chance on Elivis Andrus as a baby rookie, decided Konerko wasn't washed up, decdided Rolen wasn't washed up, decided Lind had finally arrived, concluded Matsui could come back from injury quickly and then on the pitching side took the long leap on Vicente Padilla and Edwin Jackson .... And banked Beckett and Burnett.
Damn, I don't think anyone will catch him. Tola has six starters: Saunders, Pettite, Garza, Millwood, Price and Masterson. Nope. Not enough miracles in those arms.
As for the BCL: Nady gone for the year, Beltre out till September, DeRosa maybe gone for the year, Giambi everything anyone who drafts an A deserves him to be. I see a splendid battle for third, and Berger cruising, the full Al Pacino.
Meanwhile, Brad, Bob and Russ battle for last place and the complimentary night with the hooker. Wait, that's a night with the complimentary hooker, the one with the learning disability when it comes to units of measure.
Standings from 6/7/2009 thru 7/9/2009 (including game stats through 7/8/2009)
Download to Excel
Name | Avg | HR | R | RBI | SB | ERA | K | S | W | W PCT | Total |
Giant Steps | 9.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 78.0 |
T. S. Intellectual | 4.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 62.0 |
Little Chi Chi | 7.0 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 56.0 |
The Money Shot | 5.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 56.0 |
A Cancer on the League | 3.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 53.0 |
The Depositions | 8.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 45.0 |
Marfa Dogs | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 42.0 |
The Stinking Badgers | 6.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 36.0 |
The FunGhouls | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 22.0 |
Batting Average
Name | Total | Points |
Giant Steps | .3048 | 9 |
The Depositions | .2784 | 8 |
Little Chi Chi | .2744 | 7 |
The Stinking Badgers | .2683 | 6 |
The Money Shot | .2619 | 5 |
T. S. Intellectual | .2615 | 4 |
A Cancer on the League | .2578 | 3 |
The FunGhouls | .2551 | 2 |
Marfa Dogs | .2408 | 1 |
Home Runs (Batter)
Name | Total | Points |
Giant Steps | 44 | 9 |
The Money Shot | 38 | 8 |
T. S. Intellectual | 34 | 7 |
The Depositions | 28 | 5.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 28 | 5.5 |
Marfa Dogs | 27 | 4 |
Little Chi Chi | 25 | 2.5 |
The FunGhouls | 25 | 2.5 |
The Stinking Badgers | 24 | 1 |
RBI
Name | Total | Points |
Giant Steps | 143 | 9 |
T. S. Intellectual | 124 | 8 |
The Money Shot | 119 | 7 |
A Cancer on the League | 111 | 6 |
The Depositions | 110 | 5 |
Little Chi Chi | 95 | 4 |
The Stinking Badgers | 88 | 3 |
Marfa Dogs | 86 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | 84 | 1 |
Runs (Batter)
Name | Total | Points |
T. S. Intellectual | 130 | 9 |
The Money Shot | 129 | 8 |
Giant Steps | 127 | 7 |
Little Chi Chi | 124 | 6 |
A Cancer on the League | 118 | 5 |
The Depositions | 112 | 4 |
The Stinking Badgers | 101 | 3 |
The FunGhouls | 96 | 2 |
Marfa Dogs | 64 | 1 |
Stolen Bases
Name | Total | Points |
T. S. Intellectual | 33 | 9 |
The Depositions | 24 | 7.5 |
The Stinking Badgers | 24 | 7.5 |
Little Chi Chi | 22 | 5.5 |
A Cancer on the League | 22 | 5.5 |
Giant Steps | 15 | 4 |
The FunGhouls | 12 | 3 |
The Money Shot | 11 | 2 |
Marfa Dogs | 8 | 1 |
ERA
Name | Total | Points |
Marfa Dogs | 2.6144 | 9 |
Giant Steps | 2.6957 | 8 |
Little Chi Chi | 3.0181 | 7 |
A Cancer on the League | 3.6541 | 6 |
The Money Shot | 3.8802 | 5 |
The FunGhouls | 4.0653 | 4 |
The Stinking Badgers | 4.3693 | 3 |
The Depositions | 4.6901 | 2 |
T. S. Intellectual | 4.7699 | 1 |
Pitcher Winning Percent
Name | Total | Points |
Giant Steps | .7200 | 9 |
Marfa Dogs | .7000 | 8 |
The Money Shot | .6471 | 7 |
T. S. Intellectual | .6000 | 6 |
A Cancer on the League | .5517 | 5 |
The FunGhouls | .5455 | 4 |
The Stinking Badgers | .5263 | 3 |
Little Chi Chi | .4800 | 2 |
The Depositions | .4375 | 1 |
Saves
Name | Total | Points |
Little Chi Chi | 20 | 9 |
The Depositions | 17 | 8 |
The Money Shot | 12 | 7 |
Marfa Dogs | 11 | 6 |
Giant Steps | 10 | 5 |
T. S. Intellectual | 6 | 4 |
A Cancer on the League | 3 | 3 |
The Stinking Badgers | 0 | 1.5 |
The FunGhouls | 0 | 1.5 |
Strikeouts
Name | Total | Points |
Giant Steps | 184 | 9 |
Little Chi Chi | 179 | 8 |
T. S. Intellectual | 168 | 7 |
A Cancer on the League | 164 | 6 |
The Stinking Badgers | 141 | 5 |
Marfa Dogs | 139 | 4 |
The Money Shot | 138 | 3 |
The Depositions | 114 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | 113 | 1 |
Wins
Name | Total | Points |
Giant Steps | 18 | 9 |
A Cancer on the League | 16 | 8 |
T. S. Intellectual | 15 | 7 |
Marfa Dogs | 14 | 6 |
Little Chi Chi | 12 | 5 |
The Money Shot | 11 | 4 |
The Stinking Badgers | 10 | 3 |
The Depositions | 7 | 2 |
The FunGhouls | 6 | 1 |
Monday, June 08, 2009
News and Notes from Around the League
Name Avg HR R RBI SB ERA K S W W PCT Total
The Stinking Badgers
8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 1.0 7.0 8.0 72.5
Giant Steps
4.0 5.5 6.0 5.0 7.5 9.0 8.0 2.5 9.0 9.0 65.5
The Depositions
9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 3.5 4.0 60.5
A Cancer on the League
3.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 3.0 47.5
The FunGhouls
5.0 5.5 2.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 2.5 5.5 5.0 46.5
T. S. Intellectual
7.0 1.0 7.0 3.0 9.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 44.0
Marfa Dogs
1.0 2.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 42.5
Little Chi Chi
2.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 9.0 3.5 6.0 41.5
The Money Shot
6.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 29.5
Why has Peter surged to first place? It’s not enough to say the goddess has a ‘wide on’ for Peter. Who in the league is not a morsel to delight an average woman’s sex palate? No, we are a league long on charm, longer (in fact) on charm than on skill. So the question remains: blind luck or a series of master strokes on Peter’s part? (Peter does love to lay some master strokes on his part, of course, but that is semantic quibbling, so we will leave it alone. Which is more than you can say about Peter and his part. He’s a veritable coxswain: Stroke! Stroke! Stroke!)
Where was I?
How do we explain Peter’s success? He manned up and took Halliday, willing to spend money to make money, and thence on to the rest of his pitchers. Here is our first ‘aha’ moment. We are now a little frightened. He took a chance on Lee and Liriano. Particularly in Lee’s case, we see successful but unrewarded pitching. So look at that upside. He took a chance on Liriano, who has been appalling. But there is goodness in the badness: more upside! When I examine Peter’s pitching numbers, I foresee better numbers later on, no less. And oh: McCarthy? People had lost all hope. Verlander? Risk piled on risk. The question really is: What did Peter know and when did he know it?
We are also ravished by the fact Peter did what other great champions have done and blew off saves. He only has two, yet he thrives.
Now, on the hitting side, we are immediately struck by the fact his one true ‘can’t miss’ player – Grady Sizemore – has missed. And *still* Peter thrives. Mark Texarkanas – to which Peter will respond, ‘whatever’ – is now blasting in NYC. Kinsler is living up to hype and beyond. Ichiro dazzles and went cheaper than he should have. But no one rules our little roost without
What I’m saying is Peter could hang in there and win this thing. And what a banquet that would be.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
News and Notes from Around the League
Rather than an overview, this week we’ll take a look at two teams, one doing better than expected, the second worse. The surprise challenger is Little Chi Chi, sitting on the rail and ready to surge past the BCL into 2nd place. The surprise arises in that – let’s face it – half the league members have underwear older than Matty. He’s a child. He’s still proud of having pubic hair. He needs at least another decade of experience before he should even think about cashing a check. Yet here he is, strong in third, ready to make a move on second.
Why? How??? Let’s look at his team.
Stats for Players While Active |
Name | Pos | AB | H | AVG | HR | RBI | SB | R | AVG |
SS | 118 | 30 | .254 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 7 | .254 | |
OF | 106 | 29 | .274 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 11 | .274 | |
OF | 134 | 42 | .313 | 9 | 26 | 3 | 27 | .313 | |
OF | 117 | 33 | .282 | 8 | 19 | 0 | 19 | .282 | |
3B | 128 | 33 | .258 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 23 | .258 | |
1B | 115 | 31 | .270 | 8 | 22 | 0 | 14 | .270 | |
2B | 120 | 28 | .233 | 3 | 17 | 5 | 18 | .233 | |
C | 94 | 30 | .319 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 15 | .319 | |
1B | 133 | 34 | .256 | 13 | 33 | 0 | 25 | .256 | |
Totals |
| 1065 | 290 | .272 | 49 | 161 | 33 | 159 | .272 |
Name | Pos | W | L | IP | S | W | K | ERA | |
P | 3 | 4 | 42.0 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 2.79 | 0.429 | |
P | 2 | 4 | 47.3 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 5.70 | 0.333 | |
P | 2 | 0 | 16.7 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 1.62 | 1.000 | |
P | 0 | 2 | 12.7 | 9 | 0 | 16 | 4.97 | 0.000 | |
P | 7 | 1 | 60.0 | 0 | 7 | 65 | 0.60 | 0.875 | |
P | 3 | 3 | 46.7 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 5.21 | 0.500 | |
P | 1 | 1 | 14.7 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 3.07 | 0.500 | |
P | 3 | 3 | 56.0 | 0 | 3 | 37 | 3.70 | 0.500 | |
Totals |
| 21 | 18 | 296.0 | 16 | 21 | 228 | 3.41 | 0.538 |
Damon is tracking ahead of even the most optimistic projections. Pena apparently isn’t a fluke when it comes to long ball.
Now, let’s look at Marfa, who I thought would be in the 40’s with the season a quarter gone, perfectly situated as A-Rod begins to pound.
Stats for Players While Active |
Name | Pos | AB | H | AVG | HR | RBI | SB | R | AVG |
SS | 108 | 21 | .194 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 9 | .194 | |
C | 108 | 33 | .306 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 13 | .306 | |
1B | 121 | 29 | .240 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 21 | .240 | |
OF | 58 | 12 | .207 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 | .207 | |
2B | 137 | 33 | .241 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 17 | .241 | |
OF | 124 | 32 | .258 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | .258 | |
OF | 118 | 27 | .229 | 8 | 18 | 1 | 19 | .229 | |
3B | 22 | 3 | .136 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | .136 | |
DH | 91 | 21 | .231 | 6 | 18 | 0 | 18 | .231 | |
Totals |
| 887 | 211 | .238 | 34 | 128 | 5 | 124 | .238 |
Name | Pos | W | L | IP | S | W | K | ERA | |
P | 2 | 2 | 41.7 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 4.32 | 0.500 | |
P | 2 | 3 | 39.3 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 7.32 | 0.400 | |
P | 4 | 2 | 44.7 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 4.23 | 0.667 | |
P | 2 | 4 | 47.0 | 0 | 2 | 54 | 6.51 | 0.333 | |
P | 1 | 3 | 15.7 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6.89 | 0.250 | |
P | 0 | 0 | 16.0 | 9 | 0 | 19 | 1.13 | 0.000 | |
P | 1 | 4 | 34.7 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 7.27 | 0.200 | |
P | 2 | 2 | 15.3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 4.11 | 0.500 | |
Totals |
| 14 | 20 | 254.3 | 10 | 14 | 183 | 5.52 | 0.412 |
Well, damn. What you notice first is that at .238, his team BA won’t stay there forever, and with those hits will come runs, ribs and homers. But again: *damn*. That’s a deep hole. Quentin disappoints, Gomez disappoints, Maggs DISAPPOINTS. On the pitching side, Brad’s mysterious Harrison pick (and what website shared that secret) looks prescient, but Lester puzzles more than
And here are the standings for the last 11 days.
Standings from 5/4/2009 thru 5/5/2009
Name | Avg | HR | R | RBI | SB | ERA | K | S | W | W PCT | Total |
Little Chi Chi | 8.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 75.5 |
T. S. Intellectual | 7.0 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 60.0 |
The Stinking Badgers | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 8.5 | 52.5 |
Giant Steps | 9.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 49.5 |
The FunGhouls | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 48.5 |
The Depositions | 4.0 | 3.5 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 44.0 |
The Money Shot | 6.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 43.0 |
A Cancer on the League | 3.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 42.0 |
Marfa Dogs | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 35.0 |