We are a fantasy baseball league whose draft is scheduled for May 1. Ten men enter (or nine or eight), and one man leaves.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
A Fond Farewell to a League Legend. Come Home, Prodigal Son. Peter Always Has a Little Fatted Calf in the Fridge
The Art House Version on the right
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Friday, April 09, 2010
Time to Start the Conversation about Draft Day
Image via Wikipedia
And, of course, we will need to settle on a field position for DHs, our usual practice.
Looks like it should be a good draft. We've lost Wieder but perhaps on the third day he will rise again -- pardon me, I'm used to drafting on Easter. I have Skyped with Berger, and Peter is ready to put Berger up on his mighty Mac laptop like an outtake from 1984.
Looks good. Questions?
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Monday, August 03, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Last Three Weeks: *Bob is Surging* Who Knew?
Standings from 7/9/2009 thru 7/29/2009 (including game stats through 7/29/2009)
Download to Excel
| Name | Avg | HR | R | RBI | SB | ERA | K | S | W | W PCT | Total |
| The Raiders | 9.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 65.5 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 61.0 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 5.0 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 60.0 |
| The Depositions | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 59.5 |
| Little Chi Chi | 2.0 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 46.0 |
| Giant Steps | 4.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 45.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 6.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 42.0 |
| Marfa Dogs | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 37.0 |
| The FunGhouls | 1.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 33.5 |
Batting Average
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Raiders | .3074 | 9 |
| The Depositions | .3058 | 8 |
| T. S. Intellectual | .2903 | 7 |
| A Cancer on the League | .2795 | 6 |
| The Stinking Badgers | .2564 | 5 |
| Giant Steps | .2537 | 4 |
| Marfa Dogs | .2507 | 3 |
| Little Chi Chi | .2455 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | .2449 | 1 |
Home Runs (Batter)
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Depositions | 25 | 9 |
| The FunGhouls | 22 | 8 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 21 | 7 |
| Giant Steps | 18 | 5.5 |
| Little Chi Chi | 18 | 5.5 |
| The Raiders | 16 | 3.5 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 16 | 3.5 |
| Marfa Dogs | 14 | 1.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 14 | 1.5 |
RBI
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Depositions | 93 | 9 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 80 | 8 |
| Little Chi Chi | 71 | 7 |
| The FunGhouls | 70 | 6 |
| The Raiders | 69 | 4.5 |
| Giant Steps | 69 | 4.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 63 | 3 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 58 | 2 |
| Marfa Dogs | 52 | 1 |
Runs (Batter)
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Depositions | 87 | 9 |
| Little Chi Chi | 78 | 8 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 76 | 6.5 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 76 | 6.5 |
| The Raiders | 75 | 4.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 75 | 4.5 |
| The FunGhouls | 69 | 3 |
| Giant Steps | 66 | 2 |
| Marfa Dogs | 51 | 1 |
Stolen Bases
| Name | Total | Points |
| T. S. Intellectual | 16 | 8.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 16 | 8.5 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 15 | 7 |
| The Depositions | 14 | 6 |
| The Raiders | 12 | 5 |
| The FunGhouls | 10 | 3.5 |
| Little Chi Chi | 10 | 3.5 |
| Marfa Dogs | 7 | 2 |
| Giant Steps | 5 | 1 |
ERA
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Stinking Badgers | 2.1985 | 9 |
| The Raiders | 3.2239 | 8 |
| Giant Steps | 3.5357 | 7 |
| The FunGhouls | 4.0000 | 6 |
| Marfa Dogs | 4.8926 | 5 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 5.1246 | 4 |
| The Depositions | 5.2326 | 3 |
| A Cancer on the League | 5.3006 | 2 |
| Little Chi Chi | 5.4750 | 1 |
Pitcher Winning Percent
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Raiders | .7333 | 9 |
| The Stinking Badgers | .6923 | 8 |
| Marfa Dogs | .6364 | 7 |
| Giant Steps | .6000 | 6 |
| A Cancer on the League | .5455 | 5 |
| The Depositions | .5385 | 4 |
| The FunGhouls | .5000 | 3 |
| T. S. Intellectual | .3333 | 2 |
| Little Chi Chi | .2941 | 1 |
Saves
| Name | Total | Points |
| Little Chi Chi | 13 | 9 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 11 | 8 |
| Giant Steps | 9 | 7 |
| The Raiders | 8 | 6 |
| Marfa Dogs | 7 | 5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 4 | 4 |
| The Depositions | 3 | 3 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 1 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | 0 | 1 |
Strikeouts
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Stinking Badgers | 120 | 9 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 96 | 8 |
| The Raiders | 95 | 7 |
| Little Chi Chi | 91 | 6 |
| Marfa Dogs | 86 | 5 |
| Giant Steps | 80 | 4 |
| A Cancer on the League | 78 | 3 |
| The Depositions | 69 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | 44 | 1 |
Wins
| Name | Total | Points |
| The Raiders | 11 | 9 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 9 | 8 |
| Marfa Dogs | 7 | 6.5 |
| The Depositions | 7 | 6.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 6 | 4.5 |
| Giant Steps | 6 | 4.5 |
| Little Chi Chi | 5 | 3 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 4 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | 3 | 1 |
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Thursday, July 09, 2009
News and Notes from Around the League
Image via Wikipedia
He took a chance on Elivis Andrus as a baby rookie, decided Konerko wasn't washed up, decdided Rolen wasn't washed up, decided Lind had finally arrived, concluded Matsui could come back from injury quickly and then on the pitching side took the long leap on Vicente Padilla and Edwin Jackson .... And banked Beckett and Burnett.
Damn, I don't think anyone will catch him. Tola has six starters: Saunders, Pettite, Garza, Millwood, Price and Masterson. Nope. Not enough miracles in those arms.
As for the BCL: Nady gone for the year, Beltre out till September, DeRosa maybe gone for the year, Giambi everything anyone who drafts an A deserves him to be. I see a splendid battle for third, and Berger cruising, the full Al Pacino.
Meanwhile, Brad, Bob and Russ battle for last place and the complimentary night with the hooker. Wait, that's a night with the complimentary hooker, the one with the learning disability when it comes to units of measure.
Standings from 6/7/2009 thru 7/9/2009 (including game stats through 7/8/2009)
Download to Excel
| Name | Avg | HR | R | RBI | SB | ERA | K | S | W | W PCT | Total |
| Giant Steps | 9.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 78.0 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 4.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 62.0 |
| Little Chi Chi | 7.0 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 56.0 |
| The Money Shot | 5.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 56.0 |
| A Cancer on the League | 3.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 53.0 |
| The Depositions | 8.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 45.0 |
| Marfa Dogs | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 42.0 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 6.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 36.0 |
| The FunGhouls | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 22.0 |
Batting Average
| Name | Total | Points |
| Giant Steps | .3048 | 9 |
| The Depositions | .2784 | 8 |
| Little Chi Chi | .2744 | 7 |
| The Stinking Badgers | .2683 | 6 |
| The Money Shot | .2619 | 5 |
| T. S. Intellectual | .2615 | 4 |
| A Cancer on the League | .2578 | 3 |
| The FunGhouls | .2551 | 2 |
| Marfa Dogs | .2408 | 1 |
Home Runs (Batter)
| Name | Total | Points |
| Giant Steps | 44 | 9 |
| The Money Shot | 38 | 8 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 34 | 7 |
| The Depositions | 28 | 5.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 28 | 5.5 |
| Marfa Dogs | 27 | 4 |
| Little Chi Chi | 25 | 2.5 |
| The FunGhouls | 25 | 2.5 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 24 | 1 |
RBI
| Name | Total | Points |
| Giant Steps | 143 | 9 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 124 | 8 |
| The Money Shot | 119 | 7 |
| A Cancer on the League | 111 | 6 |
| The Depositions | 110 | 5 |
| Little Chi Chi | 95 | 4 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 88 | 3 |
| Marfa Dogs | 86 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | 84 | 1 |
Runs (Batter)
| Name | Total | Points |
| T. S. Intellectual | 130 | 9 |
| The Money Shot | 129 | 8 |
| Giant Steps | 127 | 7 |
| Little Chi Chi | 124 | 6 |
| A Cancer on the League | 118 | 5 |
| The Depositions | 112 | 4 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 101 | 3 |
| The FunGhouls | 96 | 2 |
| Marfa Dogs | 64 | 1 |
Stolen Bases
| Name | Total | Points |
| T. S. Intellectual | 33 | 9 |
| The Depositions | 24 | 7.5 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 24 | 7.5 |
| Little Chi Chi | 22 | 5.5 |
| A Cancer on the League | 22 | 5.5 |
| Giant Steps | 15 | 4 |
| The FunGhouls | 12 | 3 |
| The Money Shot | 11 | 2 |
| Marfa Dogs | 8 | 1 |
ERA
| Name | Total | Points |
| Marfa Dogs | 2.6144 | 9 |
| Giant Steps | 2.6957 | 8 |
| Little Chi Chi | 3.0181 | 7 |
| A Cancer on the League | 3.6541 | 6 |
| The Money Shot | 3.8802 | 5 |
| The FunGhouls | 4.0653 | 4 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 4.3693 | 3 |
| The Depositions | 4.6901 | 2 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 4.7699 | 1 |
Pitcher Winning Percent
| Name | Total | Points |
| Giant Steps | .7200 | 9 |
| Marfa Dogs | .7000 | 8 |
| The Money Shot | .6471 | 7 |
| T. S. Intellectual | .6000 | 6 |
| A Cancer on the League | .5517 | 5 |
| The FunGhouls | .5455 | 4 |
| The Stinking Badgers | .5263 | 3 |
| Little Chi Chi | .4800 | 2 |
| The Depositions | .4375 | 1 |
Saves
| Name | Total | Points |
| Little Chi Chi | 20 | 9 |
| The Depositions | 17 | 8 |
| The Money Shot | 12 | 7 |
| Marfa Dogs | 11 | 6 |
| Giant Steps | 10 | 5 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 6 | 4 |
| A Cancer on the League | 3 | 3 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 0 | 1.5 |
| The FunGhouls | 0 | 1.5 |
Strikeouts
| Name | Total | Points |
| Giant Steps | 184 | 9 |
| Little Chi Chi | 179 | 8 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 168 | 7 |
| A Cancer on the League | 164 | 6 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 141 | 5 |
| Marfa Dogs | 139 | 4 |
| The Money Shot | 138 | 3 |
| The Depositions | 114 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | 113 | 1 |
Wins
| Name | Total | Points |
| Giant Steps | 18 | 9 |
| A Cancer on the League | 16 | 8 |
| T. S. Intellectual | 15 | 7 |
| Marfa Dogs | 14 | 6 |
| Little Chi Chi | 12 | 5 |
| The Money Shot | 11 | 4 |
| The Stinking Badgers | 10 | 3 |
| The Depositions | 7 | 2 |
| The FunGhouls | 6 | 1 |
Monday, June 08, 2009
News and Notes from Around the League
Standings from 5/16/2009 thru 6/7/2009 (including game stats through 6/7/2009)
Name Avg HR R RBI SB ERA K S W W PCT Total
The Stinking Badgers
8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 1.0 7.0 8.0 72.5
Giant Steps
4.0 5.5 6.0 5.0 7.5 9.0 8.0 2.5 9.0 9.0 65.5
The Depositions
9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 3.5 4.0 60.5
A Cancer on the League
3.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 3.0 47.5
The FunGhouls
5.0 5.5 2.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 2.5 5.5 5.0 46.5
T. S. Intellectual
7.0 1.0 7.0 3.0 9.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 44.0
Marfa Dogs
1.0 2.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 42.5
Little Chi Chi
2.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 9.0 3.5 6.0 41.5
The Money Shot
6.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 29.5
Why has Peter surged to first place? It’s not enough to say the goddess has a ‘wide on’ for Peter. Who in the league is not a morsel to delight an average woman’s sex palate? No, we are a league long on charm, longer (in fact) on charm than on skill. So the question remains: blind luck or a series of master strokes on Peter’s part? (Peter does love to lay some master strokes on his part, of course, but that is semantic quibbling, so we will leave it alone. Which is more than you can say about Peter and his part. He’s a veritable coxswain: Stroke! Stroke! Stroke!)
Where was I?
How do we explain Peter’s success? He manned up and took Halliday, willing to spend money to make money, and thence on to the rest of his pitchers. Here is our first ‘aha’ moment. We are now a little frightened. He took a chance on Lee and Liriano. Particularly in Lee’s case, we see successful but unrewarded pitching. So look at that upside. He took a chance on Liriano, who has been appalling. But there is goodness in the badness: more upside! When I examine Peter’s pitching numbers, I foresee better numbers later on, no less. And oh: McCarthy? People had lost all hope. Verlander? Risk piled on risk. The question really is: What did Peter know and when did he know it?
We are also ravished by the fact Peter did what other great champions have done and blew off saves. He only has two, yet he thrives.
Now, on the hitting side, we are immediately struck by the fact his one true ‘can’t miss’ player – Grady Sizemore – has missed. And *still* Peter thrives. Mark Texarkanas – to which Peter will respond, ‘whatever’ – is now blasting in NYC. Kinsler is living up to hype and beyond. Ichiro dazzles and went cheaper than he should have. But no one rules our little roost withouta stroke of luck good fortune. Choo-Choo is hitting. Astrolabe Cabrera is now on the world’s radar. Varitek was written off and has proceeded to write himself back on.
What I’m saying is Peter could hang in there and win this thing. And what a banquet that would be.
Name Avg HR R RBI SB ERA K S W W PCT Total
The Stinking Badgers
8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 1.0 7.0 8.0 72.5
Giant Steps
4.0 5.5 6.0 5.0 7.5 9.0 8.0 2.5 9.0 9.0 65.5
The Depositions
9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 3.5 4.0 60.5
A Cancer on the League
3.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 3.0 47.5
The FunGhouls
5.0 5.5 2.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 2.5 5.5 5.0 46.5
T. S. Intellectual
7.0 1.0 7.0 3.0 9.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 44.0
Marfa Dogs
1.0 2.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 42.5
Little Chi Chi
2.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 9.0 3.5 6.0 41.5
The Money Shot
6.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 29.5
Why has Peter surged to first place? It’s not enough to say the goddess has a ‘wide on’ for Peter. Who in the league is not a morsel to delight an average woman’s sex palate? No, we are a league long on charm, longer (in fact) on charm than on skill. So the question remains: blind luck or a series of master strokes on Peter’s part? (Peter does love to lay some master strokes on his part, of course, but that is semantic quibbling, so we will leave it alone. Which is more than you can say about Peter and his part. He’s a veritable coxswain: Stroke! Stroke! Stroke!)
Where was I?
How do we explain Peter’s success? He manned up and took Halliday, willing to spend money to make money, and thence on to the rest of his pitchers. Here is our first ‘aha’ moment. We are now a little frightened. He took a chance on Lee and Liriano. Particularly in Lee’s case, we see successful but unrewarded pitching. So look at that upside. He took a chance on Liriano, who has been appalling. But there is goodness in the badness: more upside! When I examine Peter’s pitching numbers, I foresee better numbers later on, no less. And oh: McCarthy? People had lost all hope. Verlander? Risk piled on risk. The question really is: What did Peter know and when did he know it?
We are also ravished by the fact Peter did what other great champions have done and blew off saves. He only has two, yet he thrives.
Now, on the hitting side, we are immediately struck by the fact his one true ‘can’t miss’ player – Grady Sizemore – has missed. And *still* Peter thrives. Mark Texarkanas – to which Peter will respond, ‘whatever’ – is now blasting in NYC. Kinsler is living up to hype and beyond. Ichiro dazzles and went cheaper than he should have. But no one rules our little roost without
What I’m saying is Peter could hang in there and win this thing. And what a banquet that would be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)